Euthanasia Essay - Mercy Killing Not Necessary The definition of mercy killing is where someone is terminally ill with a disease, and an accomplice helps to end the misery of that victim's life. In my opinion, this decision should be a live and let live decision Zakyah Basri’s essay on mercy killing uses a rhetorical question as a title: Euthanasia: Which M is It? Mercy or Murder? While this title treats the subject a bit simplistically, it reflects the essence of the debate on mercy killing: whether it is an act of mercy or a simple murder Argumentative Essay: Mercy Killing - Words | Cram. Show More. Check Writing Quality. Mercy Killing, also known as euthanasia. It is a prominent topic for life and death morality issues. In most basic terms, euthanasia is the act of killing someone or letting them die at their request because they are going to die soon due to terminal or chronic illness and by killing or letting them die, one is granting them an
Mercy Killing Essay Example Free Essay Example
We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it. Type of paper: Argumentative Essay.
Topic: LawCrimeLifeDeathNursingEuthanasiaessay on mercy killing, ReligionMedicine. Many people believe that we now live in a world where we can make decisions — women are allowed to choose if and when they want to get pregnant so they take pills to ensure they have essay on mercy killing choice. However just like with birth control, there is a lot essay on mercy killing debate on euthanasia, essay on mercy killing.
Many people are of the opinion that euthanasia should not be allowed. Euthanasia is the process of allowing someone dies willingly and has being mercy killing by many. Unfortunately it is the killing that gets many people riled up as they are of the opinion that lives should not under any circumstances be taken.
Many people have wondered if people on the brink of death can still make a choice and choose death and watch such a choice be acted upon. People have argued that they should be allowed to die in dignity as many of the people who go through with euthanasia usually have some debilitating and life threatening illness that they may think they have no cure over.
They feel that allowing them to live in pain essay on mercy killing agony for maybe six more months before they die is not life at all but greed by the ones they may be leaving behind who do not want to say goodbye. Proponents of euthanasia believe that it is immoral to force people to keep on living in suffering and pain when they would rather die with dignity. These proponents claim that since suicide is not yet considered a crime that euthanasia should not be as well. But there are many other proponents who are against the idea of euthanasia as they see it as murder.
The religious groups believe that life in itself was given by God and only God can take it. There are also legal proponents who believe that euthanasia should not be allowed as they believe this leads people to take the lives of those who would otherwise have wanted to live. In most countries euthanasia is considered illegal although that has not stopped some doctors from practicing it still. In a country like the United Kingdom it is considered murder to practice euthanasia and as such it is illegal and culprits are liable to spend up to fourteen years behind bars.
This does not change even if the doctor or medical practitioner was acting on the orders of the patient. The Suicide Act takes it a step further in the UK and stipulates that people who assist, essay on mercy killing, counsel or aid someone in the taking of their lives is also liable to fourteen years imprisonment. While euthanasia has picked up many titles along the way the end result is always death - whether it is active or passive euthanasia, essay on mercy killing.
As I have demonstrated above, different countries have different laws regarding euthanasia. The law sees doctors that practice passive euthanasia as different from those doctors who will abandon a patient to die. Although the law states that any euthanasia that occurs without the consent of the patient should be treated as a criminal offense, which is to say that the patient was not pressured into arriving at that decision.
This is one of the biggest issues I have with euthanasia. If it were to be made legal, it will not be administered for the healthy but rather the weak and terminally ill. How easy will it be to convince people in this state that they are better off dying so that their loved ones may have closure?
There are many people that have been given a very grim medical report who have gone on to achieve great things because they did not give up, essay on mercy killing.
The people who make it out alive from these kind of illnesses may be few and far between but if euthanasia kills a person that would otherwise have wanted to live out their lives, no matter how short that period of time is. Euthanasia will always be compared against the religious, moral and ethical backdrop of the society. Most democratic countries accept the right to choose as a civil right. If this is the case, essay on mercy killing, an issue like euthanasia has to be made by the individual itself and many of these people that have chosen euthanasia will not have made this choice if they were to make it by themselves.
They would have preferred to go on living — no matter how short that life may be. Many religions that worship a supreme God believe that life was given to us by him and he alone can take that life.
they claim that if you had no input in how or when your birth would be then you should not determine when your death would essay on mercy killing. It is clear that not everybody will believe in a God who gives life and watches over the life, people cannot deny the fact that everybody is unique with unique DNA and a life that cannot be copied.
If indeed our lives are as precious as have been mentioned above, then why do we take these same lives. It therefore becomes the job of the society to stop people from short changing themselves through the taking of their lives. Death plays a very important role in the many different religions in the world and while these different religions treat death differently, most of them are adverse to the idea of euthanasia.
The Christian religion believe that it is God who gives life and He too should be the one who takes life and that the so called mercy killing is actually murder and should be stopped. Essay on mercy killing of the most active advocates against euthanasia is the Roman Catholic Church who actually forbids it, essay on mercy killing. They teach that people attached to the ailing should instead take care of them and nurture them in their dying days as opposed to finding a quick fix solution to their problem.
Most religions that have a supreme God stick to His command when He says that we must not kill. Religion also sees humans as being special because they were created by God.
If mankind is indeed special then they must be preserved by all means and not trivialized through the practice of euthanasia. While Christianity is adamant in its opinion that euthanasia should not be allowed, the eastern religions take on a different approach. These religions see death as being set free from mortal life.
However they too are against harming other people and euthanasia falls into the second category. While religions like Hinduism and Buddhism see death as a process of the life cycle, shortening that life does interfere with this divine cycle and is therefore frowned upon. Many other religions have different reasons as to why they are against this sort of life ending procedure and as a result euthanasia has been a heavily debated topic.
Living with the terminally or seriously ill is a huge burden on the sick person and the caregiver. This pressure has seen to the rise of hospices being prepared for people who have a very short time to live where they are cared for and given palliative care. These centres do not try to prolong the life or even shorten it but instead they try to make it as stress free as possible for all the parties involved. The staffs at these centres help to enhance the quality of life of these people who can see and tell that they are not alone in their suffering but that there are many other people with essay on mercy killing or worse cases than theirs.
These hospices help to ease the burden on the loved ones who had taken up the role of caretakers. It also reduces the resentment felt by the terminally ill patient towards their loved ones. For many years my grandmother has been suffering from depression and this depression began to make her physically ill.
It got to a point where she had to survive on anti-depressants and because she hated how they made her feel she would deliberately not take them at times. Unfortunately for her situation when she was not taking her medications, she acted violent. During her last days she became increasingly ill and emancipated and this also became a burden on her children as well.
Many times she had family watch her as the depression and many other illnesses that came about as a result. Staying at home and being looked after became hard on my mother because she was always a very energetic and busy woman and many of times she wished she was dead. As hard as it was to take care of her we did still do everything in our power till the day she just died normally, essay on mercy killing.
We knew that it was eventually going to be a losing battle but we were willing to keep her alive instead of the alternative choice essay on mercy killing euthanasia. Whenever people wondered why we were punishing essay on mercy killing by keeping her alive, we always said that the last four months of her life may have seen her have bad days but the 10 good days was worth her being alive.
The world has become a global village with longevity of life seen as a global reality. This is due to the new and improved research, better medical facilities and healthier alternatives to life, essay on mercy killing. in all this however, globalisation has not been able to stop death from happening and why some people face death and come out victorious, others suffer a long and difficult journey before they eventually die.
People are said to be living not just because they are breathing but because of the quality of life they live, essay on mercy killing. There are some illnesses that deprive people of that quality of life that was at one time or the other available to them. The people who say euthanasia should be allowed see euthanasia as a humane thing to do and not as murder Gerald.
Although I do not have data or a survey to back this statement, essay on mercy killing, I do believe that most people would want a pain free death although not everyone will enjoy that benefit, essay on mercy killing. Looking at the above one could almost believe that euthanasia is the right thing to do. In my life I have seen many things that may seem right at the start but halfway through I realise that I have made a grave mistake and then it would be too difficult to retrace my steps.
Life especially that of essay on mercy killing loved one should not be treated as a discarded or unwanted cloth, essay on mercy killing. Is there anything like death with dignity or is death just death — a finality of life. While there are people and organisations and even legislations that have been put up to stop euthanasia, there are those who believe that euthanasia should be allowed to thrive. The proponents of euthanasia believe that it is possible for euthanasia to be controlled and not abused even though it will be hard to have essay on mercy killing in place that will prevent people from abusing euthanasia.
They say essay on mercy killing is just like the law and how it affects any crime Neil There may be laws in place to prevent crimes like fraud or theft or any other crime but still there will also be people that will go ahead and commit essay on mercy killing crimes, essay on mercy killing.
The problem and the catch though is that no laws and regulations put in place will dissuade wicked people from pressuring vulnerable people to make the choice of death even though they may have wanted to live for a few days more. They however admit that it would be a better situation to create a structure for euthanasia as opposed to making no structure available. People being who they are will practise euthanasia whether it be made legal or not and the best way to minimize abuse would be to put structures in place.
They have argued that this is a similar thing to the struggle for abortion. With structures put in place, vulnerable people will be able to be protected through these structures instead of just being unnecessarily pressured to choose euthanasia.
How then would essay on mercy killing good regulation look like? An effective regulation should take everything into consideration before deciding that euthanasia is the best option.
In other words it should not be the first option but rather the last one. There are some parts of the world that have started practising such things on a reasonable scale. For the first three years of its presences only about 2 people a month used euthanasia to end their lives.
The process involved things like getting checked by a second physician who must also claim that the patient essay on mercy killing less than six months to live and many requests for euthanasia must have been given. The Criminal Code Article of Netherlands essay on mercy killing stipulated that if the patient that has made a voluntary request to die was suffering unendurable pain and is convinced that there is no other viable solution, then the doctor that assists that patient to die will not be liable of crime.
There is the fear that euthanasia will be abused if it is allowed. Vulnerable and at risk patients will be pressured by people to end their lives. While I have shown that it is difficult to take care of any ailing person, essay on mercy killing them to choose death instead of fight for their lives is wickedness.
And many of them will be coerced into choosing death. I could give an example of two AIDS sufferers. The first one may have been abandoned as a result of their illness by all they love and hold dear and in a state of isolation choose death to end it all.
Euthanasia doctor: ‘I don’t call it killing' - BBC Stories
, time: 8:22Mercy Killing - College Essay Examples
Argumentative Essay: Mercy Killing - Words | Cram. Show More. Check Writing Quality. Mercy Killing, also known as euthanasia. It is a prominent topic for life and death morality issues. In most basic terms, euthanasia is the act of killing someone or letting them die at their request because they are going to die soon due to terminal or chronic illness and by killing or letting them die, one is granting them an Mercy Killing Essay. Words5 Pages. Some people believe that mercy killing is not justifiable, while others argue against this . * In earth every human being has the inherent right to live. The right to live is the most significant and basic need of all human.”.The word Euthanasia Essay - Mercy Killing Not Necessary The definition of mercy killing is where someone is terminally ill with a disease, and an accomplice helps to end the misery of that victim's life. In my opinion, this decision should be a live and let live decision
No comments:
Post a Comment